When a writer addresses the criteria for evaluating evidence in an argument, which type of writing are they engaging in?

The correct answer highlights that when a writer addresses the criteria for evaluating evidence in an argument, they are engaging in editorial writing. Editorial writing is fundamentally opinion-based and involves presenting arguments and persuasive elements. This type of writing requires the author to justify their stance using evidence, making it vital to evaluate the credibility and relevance of that evidence. By addressing criteria for evaluating evidence, the writer enhances the persuasive nature of their argument, showing readers how to discern valid points from less compelling ones.

In contrast, expository writing primarily aims to inform or explain a topic without necessarily advocating for a specific viewpoint; it focuses on clarity and factual information rather than persuasion. Functional or technical writing is more utilitarian, providing instructions or explanations, which does not typically involve argumentative frameworks. Problem/Solution writing deals with identifying issues and proposing solutions but may not necessarily require the analysis of evidence in an evaluative manner as a central focus. Thus, the nature of editorial writing aligns most closely with the task of evaluating evidence in order to build a persuasive argument.